Sex - Staff Monitoring Report 2024/25

Sex 2024/25

Females continue to make up the majority of the university’s workforce, at 63.1% - significantly higher than the HESA Sector benchmark of 55%.​

Female staff are particularly highly represented in Professional and Support roles (67.4%), compared to Academic roles (59.7%) – and as with age, Academic staff are the furthest from the HESA Benchmark.​

Senior female representation continues to increase, with females making up over half (53.9%) of the senior level population for the last 2 years – with more even representation in Professional services and Academic roles (55.4% and 52.7%) than in the total population. ​

Senior Academic female representation has increased over the last 5 years, reducing the gap between senior and non-senior representation.​

​Proportion of the population by Sex vs HESA

Horizontal bar chart comparing the proportion of staff who have disclosed a disability by sex in the organisation (OU, dark blue) with the HESA benchmark (grey). Details in the data table available after this graphic.

​Proportion of the population by Sex vs HESA
Sex% OU% HESA
Female63.1%55.3%
Male36.9%44.7%

The OU has a higher proportion of female staff compared to the HESA benchmark.

HESA Sector data taken from 2026 report on 2024/25 statistics​

Proportion of the population by Sex - 5 year trend

Line chart showing the proportion of staff by sex over five academic years, from 2020/21 to 2024/25. Details in the data table available after this graphic.

Proportion of the population by Sex - 5 year trend
Year% Female% Male
2020/2162.1%37.9%
2021/2262.7%37.3%
2022/2363.0%37.0%
2023/2463.2%36.8%
2024/2563.1%36.9%

The proportion of female staff remained stable at around 63% (and male at 37%).

Sex by Employee Group and Subgroup​

Although females make up 63% all university staff, representation is not evenly distributed between employee groups and role types.​

Female staff are particularly highly represented in Professional and Support roles (67.4%), compared to Academic roles (59.7%), with the exception of Regional Academic Staff (73% female). ​

As with age and ethnicity, Academic Staff are the furthest from HESA benchmark of 49% at nearly 60%.​

% Female by employee group vs HESA

Horizontal bar chart comparing the proportion of female staff by employee group in the organisation (OU, dark blue) with the HESA benchmark (grey). Details in the data table available after this graphic.

% Female by employee group vs HESA
Employee group% OU% HESA
Academic Staff59.7%49.2%
Professional & Support Staff67.4%62.7%

The OU has a higher proportion of female Academic Staff and Professional and Support Staff compared to the HESA benchmark.

HESA Sector data taken from 2026 report on 2024/25 statistics​

Back to top

Employee Subgroup by Sex

Stacked bar chart showing the sex composition of six employee subgroups, split between Academic Staff and Professional & Support Staff. A dotted outline groups Associate Lecturers, Central Academic Staff, Regional Academic Staff and Research Staff together as Academic Staff, while Academic Related Staff and Support Staff are shown separately as Professional & Support Staff. Details in the data table available after this graphic.

Employee Subgroup by Sex
Employee Subgroup% Female% Male
Associate Lecturer59.7%40.3%
Central Academic Staff55.1%44.9%
Regional Academic Staff73.2%26.8%
Research Staff 52.6%47.4%
Academic Related Staff66.0%34.0%
Support Staff69.6%30.4%

Women represent the majority in all staff subgroups.

Sex - representation at senior level​

Senior female representation has exceeded the 45% target for the last 5 years, and continues to increase, with females making up over half (53.9%) of the senior level population for the last 2 years.​

Although Senior female representation remains higher in SS grades (55.4% vs 52.7% in PB grades), our sustained 5-year overall increase is driven by PB grades – increasing by over a third from 39.3% to 52.7%, narrowing the gap from 59.7% total female Academic representation. SS grades now have a wider gap at 52.7% senior %female against 67.4% total female PSS representation.​

Representation of females at senior level by grade group

Bar chart showing the proportion of female staff at senior level by grade group. Details in the data table available after this graphic.

Representation of females at senior level by grade group
Grade group% Female
PB1-PB352.7% (n=88)
SS0-SS555.4% (n=77)

Female staff represent more than half of senior level staff.

Representation of females at senior level 5yr trend vs 2026 target

Bar chart showing the proportion of female staff at senior level over five academic years, from 2020/21 to 2024/25, compared with the Equality Scheme 2026 target of 45%. Details in the data table available after this graphic.

Representation of females at senior level 5yr trend vs 2026 target
Year% Female
2020/2146.2%
2021/2247.9%
2022/2349.4%
2023/2453.6%
2024/2553.9%

Representation exceeded the 45% target in every year and has shown a generally upward trend over the period.

Representation of females at senior level 5yr trend vs 2026 target

Line chart showing the proportion of female staff at senior level by grade group over five academic years, compared with the Equality Scheme 2026 target of 45%. Details in the data table available after this graphic.

Representation of females at senior level 5yr trend vs 2026 target
YearSS GradesPB Grades
20/2154.6%39.3%
21/2256.9%40.5%
22/2352.2%47.1%
23/2456.1%51.2%
24/2555.4%52.7%

Female representation in SS grades remained above the target throughout the period, while representation in PB grades increased over time, exceeding the target from 22/23 onwards.

Sex - Recruitment​

6 out of every 10 applications are from female candidates, which then grows throughout the recruitment pipeline, to almost 7 of every 10 successful applicants.​

Male representation starts low at just 38.2% of applicants, reducing by around 5 percentage points at shortlisting and a further 5 percentage points at offer stage – with fewer than 1 in 3 candidates being appointed.​

​Stacked area chart showing the sex profile of candidates through the recruitment process, from application to appointment. Details in the data table available after this graphic.

​Recruitment by Sex

Sex​

Applied
Shortlisted
Offered
Accepted

Proportion (of) Applicants shortlisted​

Proportion (of) Applicants offered​

Proportion (%) of shortlisted appointed after Interview​

Number​

%​

Number​

%​

Number​

%​

Number​

%​

Female​

7277​

59.7%​

1277​

63.7%​

434​

68.9%​

402​

68.6%​

17.5%​

6.0%​

31.5%​

Male​

4660​

38.2%​

663​

33.1%​

176​

27.9%​

167​

28.5%​

14.2%​

3.8%​

25.2%​

Prefer not to say or Blank​

256​

2.1%​

65​

3.2%​

20​

3.2%​

17​

2.9%​

25.3%​

7.8%​

26.2%​

Grand Total​

12,193​

100.0%​

2,005​

100.0%​

630​

100.0%​

586​

100.0%​

16.4%​

5.2%​

29.2%​

Back to top